REFERENCES :
- Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
- Gendron, M., Mesquita, B., & Barrett, L. F. (2020). The Brain as a Cultural Artifact: Concepts, Actions, and Experiences within the Human Affective Niche. In L. J. Kirmayer, C. M. Worthman, S. Kitayama, R. Lemelson, & C. Cummings (Eds.), Culture, Mind, and Brain (1st ed., pp. 188–222). Cambridge University Press.
- Kitayama, S., & Salvador, C. E. (2017). Culture embrained: Going beyond the nature-nurture dichotomy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(5), 841–854. – Mithen, S., & Parsons, L. (2008). The Brain as a Cultural Artefact. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18(3), 415-422.
- Taylor, T. (2006). The human brain is a cultural artefact. The Edge: What is your dangerous idea? Retrieved from https://www.edge.org/response-detail/11835
- Taylor, T. (2011). The artificial ape: How technology changed the course of human evolution (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Tomasello, M. (2014). The ultra-social animal. European journal of social psychology, 44(3), 187-194.
- Uchida, Y., & Kitayama, S. (2009). Happiness and unhappiness in east and west: Themes and variations. Emotion, 9(4), 441–456.
#MindAndCulture
Si la révolution cognitive a permis de très belles avancées scientifiques, elle semble être passée trop tôt d’une “construction du sens” au traitement de “l’information” (Bruner, 1990, p. 4).
Shinobu Kitayama (psychologue) rappelle que le processus de création de sens est fondamentalement social, interpersonnel et surtout culturel.